April 24, 2024
Analysis

Hero? Traitor? Vicious missionary? N.Korea’s many social labels

Reference book contains stunning new details about regime's classification system

Many dictatorships like to divide their citizens into several categories. Nazi Germany, for example, had Aryans and non-Aryans, and apartheid South Africa had Whites, Blacks, Indians and colored people. However, when such a classification theory was applied in practice, officials were in trouble, as in many cases they did not know to which class a certain citizen belonged. If the state instructs you that a true Aryan is a blond person with blue eyes, would you say that the Führer himself is of pure blood? If only whites are considered to be “real people,” how shall one deal with Germany’s Japanese allies? Finally, who should be considered legally Jewish? All these questions were debated in Germany in 1930s.

Communist countries had similar problems. The symbol of the USSR was the hammer and sickle, which symbolized the union of workers and farmers. Yet the Soviet Union proclaimed that apart from workers and farmers, some Soviet citizens are considered “civil servants” and some form the “layer of intellectuals.” And even this extended scheme failed to describe the whole society. One example: Who were officers in the Red Army? A usual answer was “civil servants,” but then why was the army called “the Red Army of Workers and Farmers?”

Become a member for less than $4 per week.

  • Unlimited access to all of NK News: reporting, investigations, analysis
  • The NK News Daily Update, an email newsletter to keep you in the loop
  • Searchable archive of all content, photo galleries, special columns
  • Contact NK News reporters with tips or requests for reporting
Get unlimited access to all NK News content, including original reporting, investigations, and analyses by our team of DPRK experts.
Subscribe now

All major cards accepted. No commitments – you can cancel any time.