Why mum? Explaining North Korea’s continued silence on foreign policy
Pyongyang’s unusual lack of response to foreign affairs could portend bigger policy changes
In North Korean state media analysis, omission is considered just as important as inclusion. Depending on the theme and the circumstances, what North Korea does not say can be more telling than what it does mention.
For example, let us say hypothetically that North Korea reacts to the U.S. State Department’s annual Country Reports on Human Rights every single year in some form, but this year it does not.
A major deviation from past practice, the silence is in and of itself meaningful, and its possible significance for North Korea’s U.S
- 01Hope is not lost: President Biden might actually make progress on North Korea
- 02What North Korea can do right now to stave off a full-blown economic crisis
- 03North Korea upgrades security at Kim Jong Un’s giant Pyongyang mansion complex
- 04At least 14 North Korean ships disguise themselves in international waters
- 05October surprise? What to expect from North Korea ahead of the 2020 US election
- 06How South Korea’s entry into the Indo Pacific initiative will impact North Korea
- 07How Kim’s call for typhoon help exploits cheap labor and builds political unity
- 08North Korean moderates need their power back — or nuclear talks won’t succeed