EXCLUSIVE! How Reuters Sources Keep Getting It Wrong on North Korea

September 26th, 2012

Over the past year or so, Reuters have released several “exclusive” stories that have set the internet on light when it comes to North Korea reporting.  However, it appears their main source on North Korea frequently appears to get things wrong.

After publication, these stories have led to extensive re-reporting and analysis across the internet,

You have reached the limit of your free article allowance. Subscribe today for unlimited access. Prices start from just $2.88 per week
Existing users, please sign in here:

Remember Me

Recommended for You

Without sponsors, can North Korea grow?

Without sponsors, can North Korea grow?

On the surface, the year 2014 has been relatively uneventful for North Korea. No member of the ruling family was purged and subsequently executed, no American city has been threatened with a missile a…

December 29th, 2014
The boundaries of identity on the NK-China border

The boundaries of identity on the NK-China border

On the Sino-North Korean border, there are three factors defining the rights of borderland residents. The first is citizenship – Chinese or North Korean. One cannot hold both since China does not re…

December 26th, 2014

About the Author

Chad O'Carroll

Chad O'Carroll has written on North Korea since 2010 and writes between London and Seoul.

Join the discussion

  • http://twitter.com/FredBauder Fred Bauder

    I’ve placed notes on Wikipedia talk pages about this, as Wikipedia is particularly vulnerable to republishing anything published in a source that is generally accepted as reliable. It was obvious that the talk of reform was pretty much vapor no matter where it was published. Generally information about what might happen is excluded from Wikipedia.

  • warung

    why not contact Reuters to have them react on this before publishing the article ? would have been fair

  • http://twitter.com/nknewsorg NK NEWS

    Looks like Reuters have now picked up on this article: