An Unnecessary Propaganda Victory for Pyongyang

July 6th, 2012
9

Yesterday unification activist Ro Su-hui walked across the DMZ in sensational scenes which saw him handcuffed, roped up and arrested upon his first steps across the border. Moments earlier he had been given a hero’s send-off in a highly orchestrated move by Pyongyang which can only be described, for now, as a clear but unnecessary propaganda victory.  With Ro now likely to face lengthy detention for his unauthorized visit, his arrest and case will continue to serve North Korean propaganda purposes in the months to come.  But the arrest once again underscores the controversial nature of South Korea’s National Security Law and raises questions about why North was facilitated to engineer such a significant propaganda event.

When Ro left Pyongyang yesterday morning he walked beneath the Monument to the Three Charters for National Reunification, surrounded by thousands of pro-unification DPRK citizens.  The start of North Korea’s latest propaganda coup took place just a week after a rare news conference covering the surprising news of defector Pak Jong Suk’s return to North Korea. As you can guess, KCNA milked the departure of Ro back to South Korea for its full worth.  Confident of the reception he would get as soon as he stepped across the DMZ, North Korea dispatched its media and a significant number of local citizens down to the northern side of the Panmunjon facility to witness his arrest as he returned back to his native South Korea.

As North Koreans cheered and waved their white unification flags, Ro stepped across the border and attempted to resist authorities as they went in for his immediate arrest.  As such, pictures soon emerged of the 68 year old being tackled to the ground, then dragged away, handcuffed and bound up in ropes.  Almost certainly his North Korean handlers, well-trained in the art of propaganda, gave him instructions on how to aggravate South Korean reaction as much as possible while in the limelight of KCNA’s cameras. For a Confucian society to witness a 68 year old pro-unification activist thrown to the ground will likely have provoked some genuine anger among North Korean citizens, especially from those locals brought along to witness the charged spectacle.  Unsurprisingly KCNA seized on the arrest, calling it a “fascist” act and an “antireunification racket”, even going so far  as to threaten unspecified retaliation (again).  But did South Korean authorities really need to react in this way and rope him up like a cartoon criminal from the 1940s Wild West?

Some say yes, because an example needs to be made to South Koreans. Going to North Korea on unauthorized trips is illegal and cannot be condoned.  Such a heavy handed response will help discourage other South Koreans from making ill thought out trips to North Korea. The National Security Law is there to protect South Koreans from enemy influence and to discourage pro-North Korea rhetoric from within the political system.  It is a law that has been there for decades and despite best intentions, it will always be difficult for any well meaning leader to repeal. Furthermore, when compared to North Korea’s own poisonous record when it comes to human rights, political freedom, and belligerence, it can be seen as a rather restrained and prudent policy.

On the other hand, other people say no, and disagree with the law that former President Roh made significant efforts to repeal. As Roh said in 2004, “If we are to shift to an era of people’s sovereignty and respect for human rights, don’t you think it is desirable to scrap the old legacy? The National Security Law is an old relic. Thus, we should put it into a sheath and display it at a museum.”  Unfortunately, it was because of the unnecessarily direct way the National Security Law was applied yesterday that North Korea got its propaganda victory. We are likely see KCNA and other North Korean media continue to make a big deal about this arrest in the coming months.

Had South Korea dealt with Ro’s return differently, imagine how things could have played. South Korea missed an opportunity to show North Koreans that their very own propaganda is based on false accusations.  Just imagine KCNA’s reaction had South Korea called North Korea’s bluff and allowed him to walk in a way befitting a 68 year old and conducted the arrest in private, away from North Korean cameras?  Or better still, as one commenter on the NK News Facebook page said,

“Where’s the imagination? Should have sent out Girls Generation to greet him with an ice-cream cone and a small llama on a piece of string and then just walk away, leaving him to find his own way home. Give the NK propagandists a bit of a challenge to work with.”

To those that defending the NSL (but also freedom of speech), Israel makes an interesting case study. Faced with what some might argue a much clearer and potentially existential threat from Hamas, Hezbollah and Syria, Israel is confident in letting people enjoy their freedom of speech, allowing them to say and do whatever they wish, as long as it is not inciteful, racist, or about sensitive military capacities.  With the Arab Spring in full swing, Israeli Druze citizens in February held Pro-Assad rallies without prosecution, while Arab Knesset members are free to defend their sometimes terrorist colleagues in a way that “pro-NK” members of S. Korean parliament could never dream of.  Those Israeli peace activists who promote Palestinian rights and sympathize with Hamas and Hezbollah could be viewed in similar light to Ro and this visit to Pyongyang.  Is it finally time for South Korea to think differently about how it treats those who travel to North Korea or place misplaced faith in the leaders of the DPRK?

Understandably, it is difficult for South Korean political elites to consider repealing the National Security Law, given its long history. There for six decades, doing so would require a leader to put his neck out and receive overwhelming support from both the public and political colleagues of all color, something hard to imagine in current circumstances.  And while North Korea may have scored a small propaganda victory, it doesn’t really get them much in the grand scheme of things.  However, the way in which the law is applied can change – as yesterday’s events can be seen to suggest.

See video of the incident:

Picture: KCNA

Recommended for You

Ten Things We Learned from Dr. Andrei Lankov's Reddit AMA

Ten Things We Learned from Dr. Andrei Lankov's Reddit AMA

Recently NK News, with the help of /r/NorthKoreaNews organized an Ask Me Anything session with Dr. Andrei Lankov on Reddit. The response was extremely enthusiastic, with nearly 200 contributions to th…

July 25th, 2014
2
Bill on N. Korea sanctions still awaits full House vote

Bill on N. Korea sanctions still awaits full House vote

Nearly two months ago the Foreign Affairs Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives approved the North Korea Sanctions Enforcement Act, designed to crack down on both its human rights violations …

July 25th, 2014
1

About the Author

Chad O'Carroll

Chad O'Carroll founded NK News in 2010. He is based in Washington, D.C.

Join the discussion

  • Tomas22

    Exactly my sentiments. I am amazed at how badly ROK dropped the ball. The fact is that if they had simply *guided* the old geezer into the building, then the North would have gone away completely empty handed. But that stupid bid to pin him down was EXACTLY what the north wanted on camera. The whole freshly edited version complete with emphasis on all the worst parts is already up on KCNA. You can expect to see this coupled with the recent surge in crazy “쥐명박” propaganda for sure….

  • newageman

    Hi Tad,

    I fully share your sentiment.

    The more important points in this tragic scene
    are that 1) SK is not a democratic society yet since
    its citizens cannot enjoy the basic human right to
    travel, speak, or engage in unification activities;
    2) the international advocates for human rights in
    N. Korea are hypocrates because they are so silent on
    the serious violation of humans in S. Korea; and 3)
    the division of Korea itself is the main cause of a gross
    violation of human rights in Korea today.

    Above all, Uncle Sam, the world champion for human rights, is, in fact, the main party responsible for creating and maintaining the artificial division and wall in Korea.

    When will American people wake up to this shameful fact? 

  • http://twitter.com/SinoNK_RC 盖罗杰 강로저

    Tad – I thought you gave a balanced view of a polarizing and polarized issue.  Ultimately, it’s up to the voters in South Korea to address their national security law.

    2 observations:

    1) Ro saw only the absolute best (Pretty only, please) DPRK has to offer – yet still chose to walk South! And he knew he was going to be arrested.  Let’s hope DPRK shows this on KCNA.  People will quickly realize they saw someone who was relatively free to go north and then walked south of his own will and accord after seeing the “greenest pastures”. 

    Worker’s Paradise, it would seem is relative as opposed to absolute.

    2) I’m not a trained geneticist, but I’m pretty sure there’s no DPRK or ROK gene predisposing one side to democracy and the other side to something radically different.  That means both sides will see this incident through their own cultural lens.  As you point, out a Confucian (or even Buddhist) society won’t react positively to taking down a 68 year old as though he were a violent criminal.  But since DPRK has supplanted a great deal of their religion for Juche, the lens likely yields less of a sense of outrage.  Most North Koreans have probably seen far worse.  I’m not arguing that it’s right, just that most North Koreans are likely inured to violence.

    Thanks for keeping the world informed.

    • http://twitter.com/nknewsorg NK NEWS

      Thanks for the comment.

      One wonders what would have happened if the crowd had lost control (real or fake) and stormed across the DMZ to help him out.  

      Any idea of what ROK military are instructed to do if people  try and move over?

      Perhaps DPRK soldiers would have prevented it themselves, I guess.

      Tad

      • http://twitter.com/SinoNK_RC 盖罗杰 강로저

        I think KPA/DPRK are keenly aware of ROK Rules of Engagement.  Soldier stance offers some insight.  ROK soldiers face North, deterring civilians from running south, but once south, preventing KPA from chasing those who made the big escape. 

        KPA soldiers facing toward center preventing North Koreans from moving south. 

        Under normal circumstances, the KPA usually face North, but this one required a modification.

        What was seen on the South side of MDL (in the video)  was likely a very small fraction of what was available.

        What was seen on the North side of MDL was likely a large portion of what was available.

        Both sides knew this was performance art at its best and neither one wanted to cross that invisble line.

        KPA incursions across MDL until 1976 usually resulted in ROK and even U.S. casualties.  After Bonifas and Barret were murdered in the Axe incident, there was a more self-protective ROE.  KPA discovered this in 1984 when chasing after a defector.  3 KPA KIA, 5 KPA WIA.

        Since then JSA has been tense, but non-fatal. 

  • Pingback: South Korean Man Returns From North, is Immediately Arrested - koreaBANG

  • Pingback: NK NEWS BRIEF | July 11, 2012 « Liberty in North Korea | BLOG

  • Pingback: Let Them Eat Concerts: Music, the Moranbong Band and Cultural Turns in Kim Jong Un’s Korea « SINO-NK

  • Pingback: Running for Cover: South Korea's Left | My Blog